2011年《金融時報》全球500強排名

出自 MBA智库百科(https://wiki.mbalib.com/)

2011年《金融時報》全球500強排名(FT Global 500 2011)

　　北京時間2011年6月30日晚間消息，英國《金融時報》近日公佈2011年全球500強上市企業名單，埃克森美孚重新奪回榜首寶座，中國石油列居全球第二。500強總計有53家中國企業入圍。與財富五百強按營業額排名的依據不同，《金融時報》的排名根據公司的市值，而計算市值的基準股價是2011年3月31日的股價。

　　全球500強的總市值同比增長12%，由23.5萬億美元上升至26.2萬億美元。第500強企業的市值也高達190億美元，而去年這一數字僅為160億美元。銀行業和石油行業依然最值錢，其總市值分別為44360億美元和38360億美元。礦業類由第九位晉升至第五位，其總市值增長4.1%，達到10670億美元。

　　其中，中國移動從去年的第10名滑到第16位，中國聯通由去年的289名上升為209位。根據公佈的數據顯示，全球500強的總市值2011年同比增長12%，由235,000億美元上升至262,000億美元。第500強企業的市值也高達190億美元，而去年這一數字僅為160億美元。

　　前10名企業中，中國石油第2名、中國工商銀行排第4，中國建設銀行排第9名。在前100名企業中，有來自17家ICT的企業，蘋果市值為3210.7億美元，由去年的第5位上升至第3位，微軟的市值2133.3億，從去年第3名滑至第10名。

　　通信運營企業中，中國移動的市值最高，達1848.8億美元，從去年的第10名滑到第16位。美國AT&T列20位，沃達豐為30 位，verizon列48位，日本NTT DocoMo列85位。中國另一家電信運營商中國聯通市值達391億美元，位列第209位，較2010年上升 80位，在全球電信運營商中位列第12位，較2010年上升4位。

　　其他IT企業中，IBM列14位、谷歌列28位、三星電子列36位、英特爾列47位、高通列62位、亞馬遜列77位。而諾基亞市值大幅下滑，僅為320億美元，全球排名第271位，大大低於2010年的第102位。

　　英國《金融時報》全球500強 排行榜每年公佈一次，今年已是第15期。每個季度會進行一次修正。入榜公司必須至少有15%股份在市場公開流通。

　　High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

　　This is the 15th ranking of the FT Global 500, providing an annual snapshot of the world’s largest companies. Exxon Mobil resumes its position as the world’s most valuable company and PetroChina is number two. The total market capitalisation of the Global 500 companies has risen by 12 per cent from $23,500bn to $26,200bn. The FTSE All World index has risen by 12 per cent over the same period in dollar terms. The 500th company is worth $19bn, compared with $16bn last year. Banks and oil companies remain the most valuable sectors in the list at $4,436bn and $3,836bn respectively. Mining increases its position from ninth to fifth, with its market value on the list rising by 4.1 per cent to $1,067bn.

　　The FT Global 500 table, and many others derived from the same data, show how fortunes have changed in the past year, highlighting relative performance of countries and sectors.

　　The companies are ranked by market capitalisation – the greater the stock market value of a company, the higher its ranking. Market capitalisation is the share price on March 31 2011 multiplied by the number of shares issued. The figures were converted into a common currency to allow comparison so all the figures in the main FT 500 ranking are presented in terms of the dollar at that date.

　　We have included all companies where the free float – the proportion of shares in market circulation – is at least 15 per cent. Companies are then valued on the lines of shares that are quoted on the stock market. The full value of a listed stock is included even if part of it is tightly held. Unlisted lines of stock are excluded. Investment companies are not included.

　　High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

　　A company’s country allocation in the FT 500 is based on incorporation and stock market listing, along with market perception, largely following the FTSE guidelines. This can lead to what may seem like some anomalies. For example, EADS and STMicroelectronics, both incorporated in the Netherlands, are classified as French as the main quotes are on the Euronext Paris exchange. Schlumberger and Seagate Technology are classified as US, although they are incorporated in the Netherlands Antilles and the Cayman Islands respectively. The Jardine companies appear under Hong Kong despite their Singapore listings and incorporations in Bermuda.

　　The main Global 500 table shows for each company: the rank in 2010 and 2011, the country, market capitalisation, sector, turnover, net income, total assets and employees. Also included are the price, price earnings ratio, dividend yield and the company’s year end.

　　High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

　　Companies can be ranked by any of their key statistics such as turnover (as used by Fortune magazine in its Global 500), employment or profits. While each can be interesting, we feel there are more weaknesses with these methods. Turnover, for example, does not adequately allow for banks and some financial services companies, while profits will be distorted by write-offs. A common problem affecting most methods other than market capitalisation is timing. As profit and turnover figures come from annual reports, any ranking based on them must be out of date. As annual reports are staggered through the year some of the numbers used for the rankings would relate to a period two years before publication of the ranking.

　　High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

　　In contrast it can also be argued that a ranking based on market capitalisations contains a forward-looking element in the sense that share prices include a view on investors’ expectations.

　　There are additional FT 500 tables for Europe, US, UK and Japan. There are also tables showing the newcomers to the list (and those who have disappeared), largest rises and falls in rank, market capitalisation by sector and by country as well as a list ranking all the Global 500 companies within their sectors.

榜單首頁 | 1-100 | 101-200 | 201-300 | 301-400 | 401-500

• FT Global 500 2011

• 2010年《金融時報》全球500強排名
• 2009年《金融時報》全球500強排名