2011年《金融时报》全球500强排名

出自 MBA智库百科(https://wiki.mbalib.com/)

2011年《金融时报》全球500强排名(FT Global 500 2011)

　　北京时间2011年6月30日晚间消息，英国《金融时报》近日公布2011年全球500强上市企业名单，埃克森美孚重新夺回榜首宝座，中国石油列居全球第二。500强总计有53家中国企业入围。与财富五百强按营业额排名的依据不同，《金融时报》的排名根据公司的市值，而计算市值的基准股价是2011年3月31日的股价。

　　全球500强的总市值同比增长12%，由23.5万亿美元上升至26.2万亿美元。第500强企业的市值也高达190亿美元，而去年这一数字仅为160亿美元。银行业和石油行业依然最值钱，其总市值分别为44360亿美元和38360亿美元。矿业类由第九位晋升至第五位，其总市值增长4.1%，达到10670亿美元。

　　其中，中国移动从去年的第10名滑到第16位，中国联通由去年的289名上升为209位。根据公布的数据显示，全球500强的总市值2011年同比增长12%，由235,000亿美元上升至262,000亿美元。第500强企业的市值也高达190亿美元，而去年这一数字仅为160亿美元。

　　前10名企业中，中国石油第2名、中国工商银行排第4，中国建设银行排第9名。在前100名企业中，有来自17家ICT的企业，苹果市值为3210.7亿美元，由去年的第5位上升至第3位，微软的市值2133.3亿，从去年第3名滑至第10名。

　　通信运营企业中，中国移动的市值最高，达1848.8亿美元，从去年的第10名滑到第16位。美国AT&T列20位，沃达丰为30 位，verizon列48位，日本NTT DocoMo列85位。中国另一家电信运营商中国联通市值达391亿美元，位列第209位，较2010年上升 80位，在全球电信运营商中位列第12位，较2010年上升4位。

　　其他IT企业中，IBM列14位、谷歌列28位、三星电子列36位、英特尔列47位、高通列62位、亚马逊列77位。而诺基亚市值大幅下滑，仅为320亿美元，全球排名第271位，大大低于2010年的第102位。

　　英国《金融时报》全球500强 排行榜每年公布一次，今年已是第15期。每个季度会进行一次修正。入榜公司必须至少有15%股份在市场公开流通。

　　High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

　　This is the 15th ranking of the FT Global 500, providing an annual snapshot of the world’s largest companies. Exxon Mobil resumes its position as the world’s most valuable company and PetroChina is number two. The total market capitalisation of the Global 500 companies has risen by 12 per cent from $23,500bn to $26,200bn. The FTSE All World index has risen by 12 per cent over the same period in dollar terms. The 500th company is worth $19bn, compared with $16bn last year. Banks and oil companies remain the most valuable sectors in the list at $4,436bn and $3,836bn respectively. Mining increases its position from ninth to fifth, with its market value on the list rising by 4.1 per cent to $1,067bn.

　　The FT Global 500 table, and many others derived from the same data, show how fortunes have changed in the past year, highlighting relative performance of countries and sectors.

　　The companies are ranked by market capitalisation – the greater the stock market value of a company, the higher its ranking. Market capitalisation is the share price on March 31 2011 multiplied by the number of shares issued. The figures were converted into a common currency to allow comparison so all the figures in the main FT 500 ranking are presented in terms of the dollar at that date.

　　We have included all companies where the free float – the proportion of shares in market circulation – is at least 15 per cent. Companies are then valued on the lines of shares that are quoted on the stock market. The full value of a listed stock is included even if part of it is tightly held. Unlisted lines of stock are excluded. Investment companies are not included.

　　High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

　　A company’s country allocation in the FT 500 is based on incorporation and stock market listing, along with market perception, largely following the FTSE guidelines. This can lead to what may seem like some anomalies. For example, EADS and STMicroelectronics, both incorporated in the Netherlands, are classified as French as the main quotes are on the Euronext Paris exchange. Schlumberger and Seagate Technology are classified as US, although they are incorporated in the Netherlands Antilles and the Cayman Islands respectively. The Jardine companies appear under Hong Kong despite their Singapore listings and incorporations in Bermuda.

　　The main Global 500 table shows for each company: the rank in 2010 and 2011, the country, market capitalisation, sector, turnover, net income, total assets and employees. Also included are the price, price earnings ratio, dividend yield and the company’s year end.

　　High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

　　Companies can be ranked by any of their key statistics such as turnover (as used by Fortune magazine in its Global 500), employment or profits. While each can be interesting, we feel there are more weaknesses with these methods. Turnover, for example, does not adequately allow for banks and some financial services companies, while profits will be distorted by write-offs. A common problem affecting most methods other than market capitalisation is timing. As profit and turnover figures come from annual reports, any ranking based on them must be out of date. As annual reports are staggered through the year some of the numbers used for the rankings would relate to a period two years before publication of the ranking.

　　High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

　　In contrast it can also be argued that a ranking based on market capitalisations contains a forward-looking element in the sense that share prices include a view on investors’ expectations.

　　There are additional FT 500 tables for Europe, US, UK and Japan. There are also tables showing the newcomers to the list (and those who have disappeared), largest rises and falls in rank, market capitalisation by sector and by country as well as a list ranking all the Global 500 companies within their sectors.

榜单首页 | 1-100 | 101-200 | 201-300 | 301-400 | 401-500

• FT Global 500 2011

• 2010年《金融时报》全球500强排名
• 2009年《金融时报》全球500强排名